7.7K
32 THE NATURE OF MATHEMATICS multiplication, and division 1 are interpretable in much the same way as new points whether the "a" and "6" in "a + b," "a b," "ab," and so on, stand for numbers or factors, and we have, for example, a + b = b + a, ab = ba, a(b + c)=ab+ac, always. Because of this very strong analogy, mathema- ticians have called the fractions "numbers" too, and they often speak and write of " generalisations of numbers," of which this is the first example, as if the conception of number were generalised, and not merely the name "num- ber," in virtue of a great and close and important analogy. When once the points of a line were made to represent numbers, there seemed to be no further difficulty in admitting certain " irrational numbers " to correspond to the end-points of the incommensurable lines which had been discovered by the Greeks. This question will come up again at a later stage : there are necessary discussions of principle involved, but mathematicians did not go at all deeply into questions of principle until fairly modern times. Thus it has happened that, until the last sixty years or so, mathematicians were nearly all bad reasoners, as Swift remarked of the mathe- maticians of Laputa in Ghtlliver's Travels, and were unpar- donably hazy about first principles. Often they appealed to a sort of faith. To an intelligent and therefore doubting beginner, an eminent French mathematician of the eighteenth century said : " Go on, and faith will come to you." It is a curious fact that mathematicians have so often arrived at truth by a sort of instinct. Let us now return to our numerical algebra. Take, say, the number 8, and the fraction, which we will now call a " number " also ^. Add 1 to both ; the greater contains 1 The operation of what is called, for the sake of analogy, " multiplication " of fractions is denned in the manner indicated in the following example. If of a yard costs lOd, how much 10 x 4 x 7 does of a yard cost ? The answer is - pence, and we define O X o 4x7 1 5 5 as " multiplied by " f , by analogy with what would happen o x o J- if | were 1 and % were, say, 3.
Was this article helpful?
Yes0No0