7.7K
34 THE NATURE OF MATHEMATICS has developed. For centuries mathematicians used " negative " and "positive" numbers, and identified "positive" numbers with signless numbers like 1, 2, and 3, without any scruple, just as they used fractionary and irrational " numbers." And when logically-minded men objected to these wrong statements, mathematicians simply ignored them or said : " Go on ; faith will come to you." And the mathematicians were right, and merely could not give correct reasons or at least always gave wrong ones for what they did. We have, over again, the fact that criticism of the mathematicians' procedure, if it wishes to be relevant, must be based on thorough sympathy and understanding. It must try to account for the Tightness of mathematical views, and bring them into conformity with logic. Mathematicians themselves never found a competent philosophical interpreter, and so nearly all the interesting part of mathematics was left in obscurity until, in the latter half of the nineteenth century, mathematicians themselves began to cultivate philosophy or rather logic. Thus we must go out of the historical order to explain what "negative numbers" means. First, we must premise that when an algebraical expression is enclosed in brackets, it sig- nifies that the whole result of that expression stands in the same relation to surrounding symbols as if it were one letter only. Thus, "a (b c) " means that from a we are to take 6 c, or what is left after taking c from 6. It is not, there- fore, the same as a 6 c. In fact we easily find that a (b c) is the same as 06 + c. Note also that " (a + 6) (c+d) " means (a + b) multiplied by (c + d). Now, suppose a and 6 are numbers, and a is greater than 6. Let a 6 be c. To get c from a, we carry out the operation of taking away 6. This operation, which is the fulfilment of the order: "Subtract 6," is a "negative number." Mathe- maticians call it a "number" and denote it by " 6" simply because of analogy : the same rules for calculation hold for " negative numbers " and " positive numbers " like " -f 6," whose meaning is now clear too, as do for our signless numbers ; when "addition," "subtraction," &c., are redefined for these operations. The way in which this redefinition must take place is evident when we represent integers, fractions, and positive and negative numbers by points on a straight line.
Was this article helpful?
Yes0No0