2.4K
xx PREFACE God's existence in favor of a posteriori arguments taken from principles of Aristotelian physics sums up his rejection of the a priori. Moreover the multiplicity of the natural order can only be drawn from that order and not from rational psychology as an independent moment of intellectual intuition. The divine light exists indeed in a remote sense, though not as ideas immediately instrumental in analytic thought. Man's active in- tellect, operating according to the conditions of abstraction, is sufficient to explain how the intellect knows. The basis of formal certitude rests in the reflexive act of the soul, the 'reflection of the intellect on its own act/ It is on this level and through this mode that the intellect grounds the syntax of logic respecting both complex and incomplex modes of reason. Logic is a discipline dealing with rational entities knowable apart from things of nature, and hence the logician does not have to know all sciences before he can formulate the modes of logic. Logic asserts forms of discourse, but the natural sciences use the forms to make assertions about things existing in the natural order. Accordingly, the logician unversed in biology, for example, will not know the natural entities of biology, yet he will know the incomplex and complex dis- cursive modes by means of which things biological are for- mulable. This presents two aspects: i. The reflexive analysis of modes of thought, and 2. Natural entities existing independently of the knowing intellect. God did not create man and leave man to create the inferior beings in the order of creation. Logic is then presupposed for science, but in addition the propositions of natural science are about univocal signs of many. This latter relationship must be conditioned by the thing if there is to be an adequation between the sign and the thing signaled based on some other principle than the power of the mind to for- mulate arbitrary associations.