7.7K
GROWTH OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE 19 bodies as require much vulgar handicraft : in this way mechanics was dissimilated and expelled from geometry, and, being for a long time looked down upon by philosophy, became one of the arts of war." In fact, manual labour was looked down upon by the Greeks, and a sharp distinction was drawn between the slaves, who performed bodily work and really observed nature, and the leisured upper classes who speculated and often only knew Nature by hearsay. This explains much of the naive, hazy, and dreamy character of ancient natural science. Only seldom did the impulse to make experiments for oneself break through ; but when it did, a great progress resulted, as was the case with Archytas and Archimedes. Archimedes, like Plato, held that it was undesirable for a philosopher to seek to apply the results of science to any practical use ; but, whatever might have been his view of what ought to be the case, he did actually introduce a large number of new inventions. We will not consider further here the development of mathematics with other ancient nations, nor the chief problems investigated by the Greeks ; such details may be found in some of the books mentioned in the Bibliography at the end. The object of this chapter is to indicate the nature of the science of geometry, and how certain practical needs gave rise to investi- gations in which appears an abstract science which was worthy of being cultivated for its own sake, and which incidentally gave rise to advantages of a practical nature. There are two branches of mathematics which began to be cultivated by the Greeks, and which allow a connection to be formed between the spirits of ancient and modern mathematics. The first is the method of geometrical analysis to which Plato seems to have directed attention. The analytical method of proof begins by assuming that the theorem or problem is solved, and thence deducing some result. If the result be false, the theorem is not true or the problem is incapable of solution : if the result be true, if the steps be reversible, we get (by reversing them) a synthetic proof ; but if the steps be not reversible, no conclusion can be drawn. "We notice that the leading thought in analysis is that which is fundamental in algebra, and which we have noticed in the case of Ahmes : the calculation or reasoning with an unknown entity, which is
Was this article helpful?
Yes0No0